2009-04-18                     Senate Journal                      Page 1038
SB 96                                                                                                                         
Message dated April 17 was read stating the House passed and                                                                    
returned for consideration CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 96(FIN) "An                                                                   
Act relating to nonpayment of child support, to the definition of the                                                           
term "state" for the purposes of the Uniform Interstate Family Support                                                          
Act, to certain judicial and administrative orders for medical support                                                          
of a child, to periodic review and adjustment of child support orders,                                                          
to relief from administrative child support orders, to child support                                                            
arrearages, and to medical support of a child and the Alaska Native                                                             
family assistance program; amending Rule 90.3, Alaska Rules of Civil                                                            
Procedure; and providing for an effective date" with the following                                                              
amendment:                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
          HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO.                                                                                   
          96(FIN)                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Senator Ellis moved that the Senate concur in the House amendment.                                                              
                                                                                                                                

2009-04-18                     Senate Journal                      Page 1039
The question being: "Shall the Senate concur in the House                                                                       
amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
HCS CSSB 96(FIN)                                                                                                                
Shall the Senate Concur in the House Amendment                                                                                  
to CSSB 96(FIN)?  EFDs   Court Rule Change                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  18   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1  VACANT:  1                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Ellis, French, Huggins, Kookesh,                                                                    
McGuire, Menard, Meyer, Olson, Paskvan, Stedman, Stevens,                                                                       
Therriault, Thomas, Wagoner, Wielechowski                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  Hoffman                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
and so, the Senate concurred in the House amendment, thus adopting                                                              
HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 96(FIN) "An Act                                                                             
relating to nonpayment of child support, to the definition of the term                                                          
'state' for the purposes of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act,                                                          
to certain judicial and administrative orders for medical support of a                                                          
child, to periodic review and adjustment of child support orders, to                                                            
relief from administrative child support orders, to child support                                                               
arrearages, and to medical support of a child and the Alaska Native                                                             
family assistance program; amending Rule 90.3, Alaska Rules of Civil                                                            
Procedure; and providing for an effective date."                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on                                                                
concurrence be considered the vote on the effective date clauses.                                                               
Without objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the                                                            
passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court Rule change.                                                            
Without objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
The Secretary was requested to notify the House.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
The bill was referred to the Secretary for enrollment.